The Cost and the Benefit of Risk

In the previous chapter, we developed the tools to calculate and measure risk. We learned about probability distributions, expected values, covariance, and the power of diversification. But we left a critical question unanswered: what is the cost of risk?

We stated that investors are risk-averse and require a risk premium, but we did not quantify it. This chapter tackles that challenge head-on. We will explore how to calculate the cost of risk, examine common mistakes in doing so, and finally, consider the other side of the coin: the potential benefit that risk can bring.

6.1 The Cost of Risk

The cost of risk is not a physical cost like a raw material or a wage. It is an opportunity cost. It represents what investors give up, or the extra return they demand, to bear uncertainty.

To understand this, imagine two projects:

• Project A: A risk-free bond that guarantees a return of €100 in one year.
• Project B: A risky venture with an expected return of €100 in one year, but with a wide range of possible outcomes—it could return €200, €100, or €0.

Which project would you choose? Almost everyone would choose the risk-free Project A. Project B offers the same expected return but with uncertainty. The fact that Project B is less attractive, despite having the same expected value, demonstrates that risk has a cost.

The cost of risk, then, is the amount of expected return that investors must be offered to willingly choose the risky project over the risk-free one. If investors would only choose Project B if its expected return were €120, then the cost of risk for this particular project is €20.

This can be expressed as:

Expected Return Required = Risk-Free Return + Cost of Risk

The cost of risk is the risk premium. It is the extra compensation required to make investors indifferent between a certain outcome and an uncertain one with the same expected value.

6.2 Discounting the Cost of Risk

Just as we discount future cash flows, we can also think about discounting the cost of risk. The cost of risk is not a one-time charge; it compounds over time.

Consider a project that will pay off in two years. The uncertainty about the outcome is greater than for a one-year project. There is more time for things to go wrong, or right. Therefore, the risk premium required for a two-year project is typically larger than for a one-year project.

This is why, in practice, risk-adjusted discount rates increase with time. The further into the future a cash flow is, the more it is discounted, not just for the time value of money, but for the accumulated uncertainty surrounding it. This is captured in the standard discounted cash flow formula for a risky project:

Present Value = Expected Future Cash Flow / (1 + r + p)^n

Where:

• r is the risk-free rate (compensation for time).
• p is the risk premium (compensation for risk).
• n is the number of years.

The denominator grows exponentially with time, reflecting the compounding effect of both time and risk.

6.3 Two Common Mistakes About the Cost of Risk

The subtlety of the cost of risk often leads to two common and serious mistakes.

Mistake 1: Confusing the Cost of Risk with a Real Cost

The first mistake is to treat the cost of risk as if it were a tangible expense, like a tax or a fee. An investor might think, "This project is risky, so I need to subtract a risk cost of €10,000 from my expected profits."

This is incorrect. The cost of risk is not a cash outflow. It does not appear on any income statement. It is an adjustment to the discount rate, not to the cash flows themselves. Subtracting a risk cost from cash flows double-counts the effect and undervalues the project. The correct approach is to adjust the rate at which future cash flows are discounted, not to arbitrarily reduce the cash flows.

Mistake 2: Applying the Same Risk Premium to All Projects

The second mistake is to use a single, company-wide risk premium for all projects. A large corporation might have a cost of capital of 8% and apply that to every potential investment it evaluates.

This is dangerously wrong. The appropriate risk premium depends on the specific risk of the project itself, not the average risk of the company.

• A company with a safe core business might consider a highly speculative venture. That venture should be evaluated with a high risk premium, reflecting its own uncertainty, not the company's average cost of capital.
• Conversely, a risky company might have a division that is extremely stable. That division's projects should be evaluated with a low risk premium, reflecting their own low risk.

Using a single discount rate for all projects will lead a company to reject safe, valuable projects (because they appear to have a low return relative to the high hurdle rate) and accept overly risky, value-destroying projects (because their high expected returns clear the low hurdle rate). The risk premium must be matched to the risk of the project, not the risk of the parent company.

6.4 The Expected Value of Random Gains and Losses

To further refine our understanding, we must distinguish between the expected value of a risky prospect and its certainty equivalent.

The expected value is the probability-weighted average of all possible outcomes, as we calculated in Chapter 5.

The certainty equivalent is the certain amount of money that an investor would accept today in lieu of taking the risky prospect. It is the amount that makes them indifferent between the gamble and the sure thing.

For a risk-averse investor, the certainty equivalent is always less than the expected value. The difference between the expected value and the certainty equivalent is precisely the investor's cost of risk.

Cost of Risk = Expected Value – Certainty Equivalent

If a risky project has an expected value of €110, but an investor would be willing to sell their claim to it for a sure €100, then the cost of risk for that investor, for that project, is €10.

This formulation is powerful because it isolates the cost of risk in a single number, expressed in the same units (euros) as the project's cash flows. It makes clear that the cost of risk is a subjective reduction in value, directly proportional to the investor's degree of risk aversion.

6.5 The Benefit of Risk

After this extensive discussion of the cost of risk, it is essential to ask: is risk always a bad thing? Does it only represent a cost to be minimized? The answer is a resounding no. Risk also brings profound benefits.

1. The Source of Higher Returns: The cost of risk exists precisely because risky assets can generate higher returns. Without the possibility of higher returns, no one would ever take on risk. The risk premium is not just a cost; it is a potential reward. Every successful entrepreneur, every venture capitalist, and every stock market investor is betting that they can capture the benefit of risk—the upside.
2. The Engine of Innovation: Almost all human progress involves risk. A scientist pursuing a new line of research, an artist experimenting with a new style, and an entrepreneur launching a disruptive technology all take enormous risks. The potential benefit is not just personal financial gain, but the creation of new knowledge, new beauty, and new value for society. Without risk, there would be no innovation.
3. The Source of Diversification Gains: As we saw in Chapter 5, the fact that risks are not perfectly correlated creates the opportunity for diversification. By combining different risks, we can reduce overall portfolio risk without sacrificing expected return. This "free lunch" of diversification is only possible because risk exists in the first place.
4. The Foundation of Insurance and Finance: The entire insurance industry is built on risk. Insurers profit by pooling uncorrelated risks, transforming the uncertain losses of a few into a predictable stream of premiums for many. Similarly, the entire edifice of modern finance—from stock markets to derivatives—exists to measure, price, trade, and redistribute risk. Without risk, these industries would have no purpose.

In conclusion, the cost of risk is a real and measurable economic phenomenon. It is the compensation investors demand for bearing uncertainty, and it must be carefully calculated and properly applied through risk-adjusted discount rates. But risk is not an unmitigated evil. It is the flip side of opportunity, the price of progress, and the very foundation upon which the financial system is built. Understanding both the cost and the benefit of risk is essential to mastering the science of finance.

Go to 👉 Next Page | 👉 Main Page

E-cyclopedia Resources by Kateule Sydney is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0